BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.Until Share feedback
Room Decision System

Every set of design options, side by side.

The whole browsable set, filterable by room.

Design options

61 sets of design options — 36 with named options · 25 visual referencesThese are concept design options — looking at one chooses nothing and prices nothing. Quoting one needs your choice, the room it is for, and an ELS check against the specification.Cost lines are relative and typical for the illustrated specification. Relative cost names the direct cost drivers, consequential work names what else changes, and watch out names the checks required. Exceptions and site conditions can change any of them. A relative direction, not an amount. Nothing here is a price; the figure belongs to whoever supplies the item and is set after measurement.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown as design options for one decision.

Supply and installation confirmed with your specification. How this is priced is confirmed after measurement, by whoever supplies it.

Vanity tier ladder — Essential
Essential
Vanity tier ladder — Signature
Signature
Vanity tier ladder — Bespoke
Bespoke
Show the trade-offs

Essential

Best for
A sound vanity where the money is better spent on getting the wet construction right.
Watch out
Fewer choices in front finish and hardware; the carcass material still has to suit a bathroom.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The entry point of the ladder.
Consequential work
Moisture zone governs regardless of tier — a vanity carcass is a wet-zone decision.

Signature

Best for
Where the vanity is a visible part of the bathroom rather than just storage.
Watch out
Easy to upgrade the front and leave the carcass and hardware under-specified.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above Essential.
Consequential work
Separate the finish upgrade from the construction requirement; they are different decisions.

Bespoke

Best for
Non-standard widths, an unusual basin, or a detail that no standard unit gives.
Watch out
Longer lead time and no margin for a late basin change.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The top of the ladder.
Consequential work
Basin and tap must be selected before fabrication — the cut-out is not adjustable afterwards.
Bathroom niche lining — Mosaic
Mosaic
Bathroom niche lining — Single-piece slab
Single-piece slab
Show the trade-offs

Mosaic

Best for
Lining a niche with a material that turns corners without a cut edge.
Watch out
Many joints inside a permanently wet recess — grout is doing a lot of work here.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Waterproofing behind the niche is the actual decision; the lining is the visible half.

Single-piece slab

Best for
The cleanest niche — almost no joints for water or grime to sit in.
Watch out
Cutting and fitting a single piece is specialist, and a mistake means a new piece.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Requires accurate niche dimensions before the slab is cut; the opening must be built to the drawing.
Commercial space conversion — Shell services
Shell services
Commercial space conversion — Operational
Operational
Commercial space conversion — Turnkey
Turnkey
Show the trade-offs

Shell services

Best for
Getting the base right — services, envelope, compliance — before any fit-out.
Watch out
It looks like nothing was done, which is hard for a client to see value in.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Foundational rather than visible.
Consequential work
Everything downstream depends on this being complete; it sets the programme.

Operational

Best for
Businesses whose margin depends on how the back works, not how the front looks.
Watch out
The customer-facing impression stays as-is, which may undercut the operational gain.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Concentrated out of sight.
Consequential work
Sequence against trading hours; operational work is harder to phase around a live business.

Turnkey

Best for
A single coordinated scope from shell to opening.
Watch out
The largest single commitment, and it needs the fullest documentation before work starts.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Requires the complete drawing and trade-scope set up front; this is the most coordination-heavy option.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon.

Hidden flush-door finish — Oak veneer
Oak veneer
Hidden flush-door finish — Paint matched
Paint matched
Hidden flush-door finish — Sintered stone
Sintered stone
Hidden flush-door finish — Wallpaper mural
Wallpaper mural
Show the trade-offs

Oak veneer

Best for
A warm continuous surface where grain continuity hides the opening.
Watch out
Grain matching across a door line needs sequencing at the factory, not on site.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Veneer sequencing must be specified; a standard order will not match.

Paint matched

Best for
The simplest concealment — the door reads as wall.
Watch out
Any movement or settlement shows at the joint, and touch-up paint rarely matches exactly.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Low.
Consequential work
Requires a decided shadow gap or flush tolerance the painter can actually hold.

Sintered stone

Best for
A hard, wipeable feature wall where the door is part of a stone-faced plane.
Watch out
Weight is the issue — the leaf and its hardware must be specified for it.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Hardware must be sized for the leaf weight; this is an engineering check, not a preference.

Wallpaper mural

Best for
A graphic wall where the image should run across the opening.
Watch out
The mural must be hung with the door line planned into it; a repair means re-hanging a section.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
The door position must be final before the mural is ordered and set out.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon: Oak fluting.

Kitchen layout — Galley
Galley
Plan: two facing runs with a 1,500 mm aisle as drawn, no corners
Kitchen layout — L-shaped
L-shaped
Plan: a 1,800 mm run turns along the side wall, one corner
Kitchen layout — Straight
Straight
Plan: one 4,200 mm run on one wall, no corners
Kitchen layout — U-shaped
U-shaped
Plan: runs on three walls, joined at two corners
Show the trade-offs

Galley

Best for
Narrow plans.
Watch out
Whether two people can pass while cooking depends on the clear aisle left with appliance doors and drawers open, and on how many cook at once — check the illustrated 1,500 mm aisle against your appliances and household. Door swings at either end can also fight the run.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Efficient: less run length than an L or U for the same storage.
Consequential work
Sets a minimum clear width between runs; confirm it before the plan is fixed.

L-shaped

Best for
The general-purpose answer — works in most rooms and leaves a natural dining or circulation zone.
Watch out
The corner is dead volume unless a corner solution is specified with it.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Pairs with a corner decision (KIT-09); leaving that open leaves storage unresolved.

Straight

Best for
Small apartments and utility runs where the kitchen is one wall.
Watch out
Everything competes for one run — sink, hob and fridge crowd each other and prep space suffers.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least run length, so the least cabinetry.
Consequential work
Appliance positions must be settled early; there is no second wall to move something to.

U-shaped

Best for
Cooks who want maximum storage and worktop with everything in reach.
Watch out
Needs real floor width; two corners means two corner problems and a closed-in feel in a small room.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The most run length of the four.
Consequential work
Two corner solutions to decide, and the open end must still take a door or circulation.
Kitchen tier ladder — Essential
Essential
Kitchen tier ladder — Signature
Signature
Kitchen tier ladder — Bespoke
Bespoke
Show the trade-offs

Essential

Best for
A sound, honest kitchen where the budget is better spent on getting the wet zone right than on finish.
Watch out
The specification is decided for you; expect fewer choices in fronts, hardware and internal fittings.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The entry point of the ladder.
Consequential work
Moisture zone still governs — the tier never overrides what a wet area requires.

Signature

Best for
The middle of the ladder, where finish and hardware quality start to show daily.
Watch out
Easy to spend here on what shows and under-specify what does not — the carcass matters more than the front.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above Essential.
Consequential work
Confirm which upgrades are finish and which are construction; they are not the same decision.

Bespoke

Best for
Where the joinery is genuinely bespoke — non-standard dimensions, unusual materials, a specific detail.
Watch out
Bespoke means longer lead time and less margin for a late change; the drawing has to be right.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The top of the ladder.
Consequential work
Requires the fullest drawing set and the earliest freeze on dimensions and appliances.
Island vs peninsula — Island
Island
Island vs peninsula — No island
No island
Show the trade-offs

Island

Best for
Rooms with genuine circulation space on all four sides.
Watch out
Clearance is the whole question; an island in a room that cannot take it makes the kitchen worse, not better.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The most, especially if services run to it.
Consequential work
Any sink or hob in the island means plumbing or ducting through the floor — a construction decision, not a layout one.

No island

Best for
Small kitchens where the floor is worth more than the extra worktop.
Watch out
Loses the social centre an island gives; the run does all the work.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
None.
Consequential work
Prep space must be found in the run instead — check it is adequate.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon: Peninsula.

Tall-unit and fridge placement — End group
End group
Tall-unit and fridge placement — Split
Split
Show the trade-offs

End group

Best for
Keeping the worktop continuous — one unbroken prep surface, with the fridge and the tall storage standing together at the end nearest the entry or the dining side.
Watch out
The group is deep and tall; at the wrong end it blocks a window or crowds the door. The fridge door needs clear space to open fully against the run's end.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Neutral to slightly less — fewer junctions between tall and base cabinetry, so fewer fillers and end panels.
Consequential work
Fixes which end takes the power point and any water point for the fridge; decide with the layout (KIT-01), because the group's end sets the prep-zone length.

Split

Best for
Placing the fridge near the entry or dining side and the oven tower near the cooking zone, when one tall group would put one of them in the wrong place.
Watch out
Each tall unit breaks the worktop; two breaks means two shorter prep surfaces, and more end panels and junctions to detail.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Slightly more — additional end panels, fillers and junction details.
Consequential work
Two power positions and two junctions to draw; both must be fixed before the carcass order, because a tall unit cannot move once the base run is cut around it.
Tall-group wall integration — Recessed niche
Recessed niche
Tall-group wall integration — Surface-mounted
Surface-mounted
Show the trade-offs

Recessed niche

Best for
A flush, built-in read where the tall group sits back into the wall plane — the calmest result in a small kitchen where the group's full depth would otherwise intrude.
Watch out
The niche has to exist or be built, which depends on the wall being non-structural or on a pocket being framed. Its dimensions have to be exact; a niche a few centimetres out cannot be fixed with a filler.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — builder's work (framing and plastering) before any cabinetry, and the tall group is measured to the niche once it is built.
Consequential work
A first-fix decision: the niche is formed before walls close, and the cabinetry is fabricated to the finished niche. Measuring the cabinetry to a drawing instead of the built niche is where this goes wrong.

Surface-mounted

Best for
Any wall, no builder's work — the usual approach, and the one that keeps the cabinetry independent of the building.
Watch out
The group's full depth projects into the room; its side is a visible end panel that needs a finish, and the junction with the ceiling needs its own decision (KIT-16).
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point — no wall work.
Consequential work
Nothing beyond the cabinetry; the end-panel finish and the top junction are decided with the fronts.
Handle approach — Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Handle approach — Integrated edge pull
Integrated edge pull
Handle approach — Integrated J-pull
Integrated J-pull
Handle approach — Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Show the trade-offs

Handleless / recessed (Gola)

Best for
A fully handleless look with a continuous horizontal line, and a good fit where circulation is tight because nothing protrudes.
Watch out
The aluminium channel collects dust and grease and must be wiped along its length; a door out of alignment telegraphs down the whole rail.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Typically higher than a pull for the illustrated specification — the profile, its end caps and the fabrication all add; the premium depends on run length and finish.
Consequential work
Sets a continuous rail across the run, so cabinet heights, filler panels and the profile finish must all coordinate before fabrication.

Integrated edge pull

Best for
A quieter line than a bar pull while keeping a real finger grip.
Watch out
The lip collects grease directly under the hand — the first place a wet kitchen shows wear.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Slightly above a bar pull.
Consequential work
Needs consistent door gaps across the run or the shadow line reads uneven.

Integrated J-pull

Best for
A handleless front with nothing to catch on — fingers hook into a J-profile cut into the door's top edge, so the line stays flush without a channel in the carcass.
Watch out
The recess collects dust and grease and needs wiping. On base units the grip is at the top edge and on wall units at the bottom, so the two feel different in use.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above a bar pull; below a gola channel, because nothing changes in the carcass.
Consequential work
The profile is cut into the door at fabrication, so the front material must take a machined edge, and the choice cannot be reversed once the fronts are made.

Bar pull (surface-mounted)

Best for
Everyday kitchens where a confident grip matters more than a flush line — and the easiest handle to replace later.
Watch out
Protrudes into circulation; in a galley it catches sleeves and pockets. Screw centres are fixed, so a later swap is limited to the same drilling.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point — the least expensive of the four.
Consequential work
Fixes door drilling at carcass stage; changing your mind after fabrication means new fronts.
Corner solution — Blind corner shelf
Blind corner shelf
Fixed L-shelves, reach in
Corner solution — Corner carousel (lazy Susan)
Corner carousel (lazy Susan)
Trays revolve on a centre pole
Corner solution — Magic-corner swing-out
Magic-corner swing-out
Front baskets swing out, rear baskets slide forward
Show the trade-offs

Blind corner shelf

Best for
Accepting a lost corner to keep the budget in the doors and fronts where it shows.
Watch out
The space is genuinely unreachable — it becomes storage nobody uses, which is a real loss in a small kitchen.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive: there is no mechanism.
Consequential work
None beyond honest expectation-setting; decide this deliberately rather than by omission.

Corner carousel (lazy Susan)

Best for
Getting usable access to a blind corner without bespoke joinery.
Watch out
The rotating tray wastes the corner volume it turns in, and heavy items unbalance it.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate — a standard fitting.
Consequential work
Sets a minimum corner cabinet width; check the door swing does not foul the adjacent run.

Magic-corner swing-out

Best for
Small kitchens where the corner has to earn its volume.
Watch out
The most mechanism in the kitchen, so the most to go wrong; alignment is fussy and service means a specialist.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest of the three.
Consequential work
Needs a specified opening width and a door front that can carry the pull-out weight.
Sink-run material — Aluminium-frame ACP infill
Aluminium-frame ACP infill
Sink-run material — Aluminium-honeycomb panel
Aluminium-honeycomb panel
Sink-run material — HPL-faced EN 636-3 plywood
HPL-faced EN 636-3 plywood
Show the trade-offs

Aluminium-frame ACP infill

Best for
The wet run and the sink base — the case aluminium composite exists for.
Watch out
It is a construction choice, not a finish: it does not change how the kitchen looks, so it is easy to cut and regret.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Below honeycomb.
Consequential work
This is the moisture-zone decision the whole kitchen hangs on; settle it before fronts and finishes.

Aluminium-honeycomb panel

Best for
The wettest positions, and where weight matters as well as water.
Watch out
Cut edges and fixings need the right detail; it is not forgiving of on-site improvisation.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest of the three.
Consequential work
Fixing method and edge treatment must be specified, not left to the installer.

HPL-faced EN 636-3 plywood

Best for
A middle path where a timber substrate is wanted and exposure is real but not constant.
Watch out
Grade and glue line vary widely between suppliers — the name on the sheet is not a specification.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Below ACP.
Consequential work
Requires the actual grade to be named in the specification, not just 'waterproof plywood'.

Plywood only where the room's specification names this grade. Otherwise the wet sink run is aluminium (ACP or honeycomb), or protected P6 where ALUMAX's listed protections are recorded and ALUMAX's site measurement finds P6 suitable; aluminium where it does not.

Not pictured here: protected P6. Unprotected board swells at the edges under a kitchen sink and fails from the inside, so ELS allows P6 there only with ALUMAX's listed protections — foil, sealed edges and penetrations, a raised bottom edge and a leak inspection — and where ALUMAX's site measurement finds P6 suitable; where it rules P6 unsuitable, the sink run is aluminium.

Wall-cabinet height — Extended 900 mm
Extended 900 mm
Wall-cabinet height — Stacked top box (720 + 300 mm)
Stacked top box (720 + 300 mm)
Wall-cabinet height — Standard 720 mm
Standard 720 mm
Show the trade-offs

Stacked top box (720 + 300 mm)

Best for
Using the ceiling height for long-term storage — the top box takes what is used rarely, and the run reads floor to ceiling.
Watch out
Whether the top box is within comfortable reach depends on the underside height above the finished floor, the gap above the worktop and the person using it, so plan it for rarely used items and check it against the user. Two boxes stacked show a horizontal joint line unless the fronts are made as one tall door.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — a second carcass and a second front per cabinet.
Consequential work
Ceiling height measured at several points along the run, because a ceiling out of level shows at the top box; and a decision on whether fronts are one door or two.

Standard 720 mm

Best for
The reference carcass height, with whatever sits above it decided separately. How comfortably the top shelf is reached depends on the underside height above the finished floor, the gap above the worktop and the person using it, not on carcass height alone.
Watch out
The space above is either wasted or has to be closed; left open it collects dust and, in a wok kitchen, grease.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point — one carcass per cabinet.
Consequential work
Decide what happens above at the same time: an open gap, a plasterboard soffit or a scribed infill (KIT-16).
Wall-cabinet opening — Hinged doors
Hinged doors
Wall-cabinet opening — Lift-up (stay-open)
Lift-up (stay-open)
Show the trade-offs

Hinged doors

Best for
The default — a simple build, typically lower cost and easy to service.
Watch out
The open door sits at head height over a work zone.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive.
Consequential work
Swing direction should be drawn against the work sequence, not chosen on site.

Lift-up (stay-open)

Best for
A clean opening above a work zone with nothing at head height.
Watch out
Gas stays are a wear part and a heavy front will drift as they age.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Requires clear headroom and a decision on strut serviceability.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon: Bi-fold lift.

Wall-cabinet opening — design options sheet
Reference sheet — not a selectable option Scroll the sheet sideways to read the labels.
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Adjustable shelves
Adjustable shelves
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Full-extension trays
Full-extension trays
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Inner drawers
Inner drawers
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Vertical dividers
Vertical dividers
Show the trade-offs

Adjustable shelves

Best for
Tall and base cabinets holding tall or irregular items, where flexibility over the years matters more than reach.
Watch out
In a deep base cabinet, shelves swallow what is at the back. Shelf pins are the weak point, and a loaded shelf sags over a wide span.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive — the reference point.
Consequential work
None significant; shelves can be moved or added later without touching the carcass.

Full-extension trays

Best for
Deep base cabinets — the back becomes as reachable as the front, so pots and stacks stop hiding.
Watch out
The runners take width and depth from the carcass, and they are the wear part; a tray behind a door needs the door open first, so a drawer front is usually the better pairing.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — a pair of runners and a tray per pull-out.
Consequential work
Runner load rating and tray depth are fixed at carcass stage, because the carcass is drilled for them.

Inner drawers

Best for
A second tier behind one front — cutlery, spices and utensils in fixed lanes without adding a door or drawer face to the elevation.
Watch out
Two actions to reach the inner drawer, and the internal height is split, so tall items no longer fit in that cabinet.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — a drawer box and its runners for each inner drawer.
Consequential work
Internal heights are planned against what goes where, and fixed before fabrication.

Vertical dividers

Best for
Trays, chopping boards and baking sheets stored on edge — visible and reachable in a narrow cabinet.
Watch out
Only for flat items; a divided cabinet is single-purpose and cannot easily be given another job later.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Low — dividers are simple joinery.
Consequential work
Decide which cabinet takes them before fabrication; the slot spacing is fixed.
Cabinet colour blocking — Single tone
Single tone
Cabinet colour blocking — Two-tone horizontal
Two-tone horizontal
Show the trade-offs

Single tone

Best for
A calm, continuous kitchen that lets the worktop or backsplash lead.
Watch out
A long single-tone run can read flat without a change of material somewhere.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point.
Consequential work
None significant — the simplest to specify and to replace a part of.

Two-tone horizontal

Best for
Grounding the run with a darker base and lifting the uppers.
Watch out
A horizontal split can lower the apparent ceiling in an already low room.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Slightly above single-tone.
Consequential work
Check against ceiling height before committing.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon.

Cabinet colour blocking — design options sheet
Reference sheet — not a selectable option Scroll the sheet sideways to read the labels.
Cabinet-to-ceiling junction detail — Open gap
Open gap
Cabinet-to-ceiling junction detail — Plasterboard soffit
Plasterboard soffit
Cabinet-to-ceiling junction detail — Scribed infill
Scribed infill
Cabinet-to-ceiling junction detail — Shadow reveal
Shadow reveal
Show the trade-offs

Open gap

Best for
A ceiling that is uneven or high, where closing the gap would cost more than it returns — or a kitchen that is not meant to be permanent.
Watch out
The gap collects dust and grease and is awkward to clean, and it reads unfinished in a kitchen that is otherwise fitted.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
None — nothing is built.
Consequential work
None; it can be closed later with either a soffit or an infill.

Plasterboard soffit

Best for
A painted bulkhead that meets the cabinet top squarely — the fitted read, and a place to run ducting and lighting.
Watch out
Built by a plaster trade before the cabinetry, so the cabinet height has to be known first; a bulkhead built to a drawing with cabinets fitted later can leave a step or a gap.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate — a plaster trade's work, priced separately from the cabinetry.
Consequential work
First-fix: framed and skimmed before walls close, with the extraction duct route and any lighting decided at the same time.

Scribed infill

Best for
A filler in the cabinet material cut to the ceiling line, so the run reads as one fitted piece in one finish.
Watch out
A wide infill shows a ceiling that is out of level as a tapering strip; it is cut on site and depends on the fitter's scribing.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate — the panel is cabinetry, fitted on site.
Consequential work
Ceiling height measured at several points along the run, and the infill depth decided against the highest and lowest.

Shadow reveal

Best for
A deliberate recessed line between cabinet top and ceiling — it reads as intended, and it hides a ceiling that is slightly out of level.
Watch out
A reveal is a detail, not a gap: it needs a return panel set back to read as one, and it still collects some dust.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Low — a set-back return panel per cabinet top.
Consequential work
Reveal depth and colour decided with the fronts; the ceiling is usually finished first so the reveal reads against a clean surface.
Dry pantry backsplash — Geometric tile
Geometric tile
Dry pantry backsplash — Matching oak
Matching oak
Dry pantry backsplash — Stacked tile
Stacked tile
Dry pantry backsplash — Washable paint
Washable paint
Show the trade-offs

Geometric tile

Best for
A dry pantry where the backsplash is the room's one graphic moment.
Watch out
Pattern needs set-out; a pattern cut awkwardly at the ends undoes the effect.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — pattern costs in laying, not just in tile.
Consequential work
Set-out must be drawn from a centre line, and cut positions agreed before laying.

Matching oak

Best for
Continuing the joinery material behind the counter for a seamless run.
Watch out
Timber behind a counter is a dry-zone decision only — keep it away from a sink or kettle station.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Confirm the zone is genuinely dry; a kettle produces more steam than clients expect.

Stacked tile

Best for
A quiet, orderly backsplash that reads as texture rather than pattern.
Watch out
Stack bond shows any wall out of plumb along the vertical joints.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Wall flatness must be checked before laying — this bond exposes it.

Washable paint

Best for
The simplest and most changeable option in a genuinely dry pantry.
Watch out
Not a splash surface; behind a kettle or sink it will not last.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive.
Consequential work
Only valid where the zone is dry — confirm against the appliance positions.

Geometric tile · Stacked tile → Next: KIT-21 Pantry backsplash tile format

Dry pantry backsplash — design options sheet
Reference sheet — not a selectable option Scroll the sheet sideways to read the labels.
Wet kitchen backsplash — Large-format slab
Large-format slab
Wet kitchen backsplash — Small-pattern feature tile
Small-pattern feature tile
Wet kitchen backsplash — Stainless steel
Stainless steel
Show the trade-offs

Large-format slab

Best for
The easiest wet-kitchen surface to keep clean — the fewest joints to hold grease.
Watch out
Handling and cutting are specialist; a single damaged slab is a whole-panel replacement.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest of the four.
Consequential work
Requires a wall flat enough to take a large panel and a decided junction at the worktop.

Small-pattern feature tile

Best for
Bringing character to a working wet kitchen.
Watch out
Small tiles mean a lot of grout, and grout plus wok grease is the hardest combination to keep looking new.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — the cost is in laying.
Consequential work
Consider an epoxy or stain-resistant grout; this is the decision that determines how it ages.

Stainless steel

Best for
Behind a heavy-use hob.
Watch out
Shows every smear and scratches with abrasive cleaning; it reads commercial, which not every client wants.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Fixing and edge detail need specifying, and the junction to adjacent finishes must be drawn.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon: Plain porcelain tile.

Design language — Cream Luxury
Cream Luxury
Design language — Muji Japandi
Muji Japandi
Design language — Scandinavian
Scandinavian
Design language — Simple Modern Minimalist
Simple Modern Minimalist
Design language — Warm Wood Modern
Warm Wood Modern
Show the trade-offs

Cream Luxury

Best for
Clients who want warmth and softness with a sense of occasion.
Watch out
Pale, warm finishes show marks and need more upkeep in a family home.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Varies by finish, not by the language itself.
Consequential work
Sets the palette for the whole property; changing it later means re-selecting materials across rooms.

Muji Japandi

Best for
Calm, uncluttered rooms where material and daylight do the work.
Watch out
Restraint only reads as calm when the storage is genuinely sufficient — otherwise it reads bare.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Varies by finish.
Consequential work
Storage has to be resolved early; this style has nowhere to hide clutter.

Scandinavian

Best for
Light, practical rooms with a soft palette and honest materials.
Watch out
Very pale timber and textiles can feel cool against Sarawak's light; the tone needs testing on site.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Varies by finish.
Consequential work
Test the timber tone in the actual room before committing across the property.

Simple Modern Minimalist

Best for
Clean lines and quiet surfaces where the architecture leads.
Watch out
Minimalism is unforgiving of tolerance — every junction and gap shows.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Varies by finish, but the tolerance demanded raises the fabrication standard.
Consequential work
Requires the tightest set-out and the most drawing of the five.

Warm Wood Modern

Best for
Warmth and grain as the main event, with modern lines.
Watch out
Timber tone must be consistent across suppliers and rooms or the property reads mismatched.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Varies by finish.
Consequential work
Sequence and match timber across rooms as one selection, not room by room.
Air-conditioning — Wall split unit
Wall split unit
Air-conditioning — Ceiling cassette
Ceiling cassette
Air-conditioning — Concealed ducted / zoned
Concealed ducted / zoned
Show the trade-offs

Wall split unit

Best for
The pragmatic default — simplest to install, service and replace.
Watch out
The wall unit is visible and dictates where furniture can sit; it dates the room faster than the joinery.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive of the three.
Consequential work
Fixes wall position, drainage fall and the pipe route to the condenser — decide before the wall finish.

Ceiling cassette

Best for
Even distribution across a square room from a single central point.
Watch out
Needs real ceiling void; it commits the ceiling design and is disruptive to retrofit.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher than a split.
Consequential work
Ceiling height, void depth and drainage fall must be settled before the ceiling is closed.

Concealed ducted / zoned

Best for
Concealing the system entirely across several rooms from one plant location.
Watch out
The most demanding of the three: duct routing, void depth and return-air paths all have to work, and service access must be planned.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest.
Consequential work
Drives the ceiling design across multiple rooms and must be coordinated with lighting and any structural downstand.

Also part of this decision, not pictured: Fans only / no AC

TV wall composition — Console
Console
TV wall composition — Console panel
Console panel
TV wall composition — Full wall
Full wall
Show the trade-offs

Console

Best for
The simplest answer — a low unit that can be replaced.
Watch out
Cables are visible unless managed, and the wall above stays unresolved.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive.
Consequential work
Socket and cable positions still need deciding, even for a loose unit.

Console panel

Best for
Anchoring the TV to a panel while keeping the storage low and light.
Watch out
The panel width has to relate to the TV and the room, or it reads accidental.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
TV size and mount height must be fixed before the panel is made.

Full wall

Best for
Making the whole wall one designed element with everything concealed.
Watch out
It commits the wall — a later TV size change or a moved socket is joinery work.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest.
Consequential work
Cable routes, sockets and ventilation must all be resolved at carcass stage.
Lighting levels — Muji Japandi — Essential
EssentialClear, practical light
Lighting levels — Muji Japandi — Signature
SignatureBetter focus and depth
Lighting levels — Muji Japandi — Bespoke
BespokeIntegrated scenes and details
Show the trade-offs

Essential

Best for
A calm, even wash consistent with the style's restraint.
Watch out
One layer only — no accent, so the room reads flat after dark.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The entry point.
Consequential work
Circuit and switch positions still need deciding at first fix.

Signature

Best for
Adding a second layer so the room changes between day and evening.
Watch out
More circuits means more switching; the control plan has to stay simple or the room is annoying to use.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above Essential.
Consequential work
Switching and dimming must be planned at first fix, not added later.

Bespoke

Best for
Where lighting is doing real work — highlighting material, texture and joinery.
Watch out
The most coordination with ceiling and joinery; a late change is disruptive.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The top of the ladder.
Consequential work
Ceiling, joinery and electrical set-out must be coordinated together before first fix.

AI design concept. Final fixture count, lumen output, CRI, beam angle, drivers, circuits, dimming compatibility and electrical scope require selected-product data and approved technical documentation.

Lighting levels — Cream Luxury — Essential
EssentialClear, practical light
Lighting levels — Cream Luxury — Signature
SignatureBetter focus and depth
Lighting levels — Cream Luxury — Bespoke
BespokeIntegrated scenes and details
Show the trade-offs

Essential

Best for
A warm, even base consistent with the style's softness.
Watch out
A single layer flattens the material depth this style depends on.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The entry point.
Consequential work
Circuit and switch positions still need deciding at first fix.

Signature

Best for
A second layer so the finishes read after dark as well as by day.
Watch out
More circuits, more switching — keep the control plan legible.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above Essential.
Consequential work
Switching and dimming planned at first fix.

Bespoke

Best for
Lighting that models the material — the point of this style.
Watch out
The most coordination with ceiling and joinery; late changes are disruptive.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The top of the ladder.
Consequential work
Ceiling, joinery and electrical set-out coordinated together before first fix.

AI design concept. Final fixture count, lumen output, CRI, beam angle, drivers, circuits, dimming compatibility and electrical scope require selected-product data and approved technical documentation.

Lighting levels — Simple Modern Minimalist — Essential
EssentialClear, practical light
Lighting levels — Simple Modern Minimalist — Signature
SignatureBetter focus and depth
Lighting levels — Simple Modern Minimalist — Bespoke
BespokeIntegrated scenes and details
Show the trade-offs

Essential

Best for
Clean, even light that suits a minimal room.
Watch out
One layer leaves a minimal room feeling stark after dark.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The entry point.
Consequential work
Circuit and switch positions decided at first fix.

Signature

Best for
A second layer to give a spare room some depth in the evening.
Watch out
Fittings are visible in a minimal room — the fitting choice is part of the design.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above Essential.
Consequential work
Fitting selection and set-out must be drawn, not left to the electrician.

Bespoke

Best for
Concealed and integrated light.
Watch out
Integration means joinery and ceiling coordination, and no room for a late move.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The top of the ladder.
Consequential work
Requires the fullest coordination set before first fix.

AI design concept. Final fixture count, lumen output, CRI, beam angle, drivers, circuits, dimming compatibility and electrical scope require selected-product data and approved technical documentation.

Fluted / slatted panel · Deep
Deep
Fluted / slatted panel · Feature
Feature
Fluted / slatted panel · Slim
Slim
Show the trade-offs

Deep

Best for
Storing real objects — books, boxes, equipment — rather than styling pieces.
Watch out
Deep shelves throw a shadow and read heavy; the back becomes dead storage.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — more material.
Consequential work
Fixing must suit the load; a deep shelf carrying books is a structural fixing.

Feature

Best for
Where the shelving is the composition, not just storage.
Watch out
It must be styled to work, which is a commitment the client has to want.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Lighting and backing finish become part of the decision.

Slim

Best for
A light visual line where the shelf holds a few pieces.
Watch out
It will not take books or heavy objects — be honest about intended use.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive.
Consequential work
Confirm the intended load before the fixing is chosen.
Floor finish — SPC (stone-plastic composite)
SPC (stone-plastic composite)
Floor finish — Porcelain tile
Porcelain tile
Floor finish — Engineered timber
Engineered timber
Show the trade-offs

SPC (stone-plastic composite)

Best for
Rooms that need timber's look with real moisture tolerance.
Watch out
The wear layer is thin: deep scratches cannot be sanded out, only replaced. A poorly levelled slab telegraphs through.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Lower than tile or timber once laid.
Consequential work
Needs a level, dry slab; screeding and moisture readings belong in the programme before delivery.

Porcelain tile

Best for
Wet and high-traffic areas.
Watch out
Hard and cold underfoot, and grout is the maintenance line — colour choice matters more than most clients expect.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Varies widely by format; large formats cost more to lay than to buy.
Consequential work
Sets floor level and threshold details against adjoining rooms; falls and drainage must be resolved first.

Engineered timber

Best for
Bedrooms and upper floors where warmth matters and water exposure is genuinely low.
Watch out
Real timber moves with humidity; in an unconditioned Sarawak room expect movement at the joints. Not for a ground floor with flood risk.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest of the three, and the most sensitive to species.
Consequential work
Requires acclimatisation time on site and a decided expansion gap at every perimeter and threshold.

Shown on a bare wall rather than a styled feature wall, so the sheen is what you compare.

Paint system & sheen — Acrylic matte
Acrylic matte
Paint system & sheen — Washable eggshell
Washable eggshell
Paint system & sheen — Satin acrylic
Satin acrylic
Paint system & sheen — Semi-gloss enamel
Semi-gloss enamel
Paint system & sheen — Mineral limewash
Mineral limewash
Show the trade-offs

Acrylic matte

Best for
Walls where a flat, non-reflective surface hides minor unevenness.
Watch out
The least scrubbable — marks in a circulation zone will show and touch-up flashes.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point.
Consequential work
Best kept away from wet areas and high-touch surfaces.

Washable eggshell

Best for
The pragmatic middle for family rooms — cleanable without a shine.
Watch out
Not fully scrubbable despite the name; check the manufacturer's actual claim.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Confirm the cleaning expectation with the client so the finish is not blamed later.

Satin acrylic

Best for
A durable, wipeable general-purpose finish for busy rooms.
Watch out
The sheen shows wall unevenness that a matte finish would hide.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Substrate preparation matters more than with a matte finish.

Semi-gloss enamel

Best for
Trim, doors and anywhere that takes hands and cleaning.
Watch out
Unforgiving of surface defects and brush marks; the higher the sheen, the more it shows.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Preparation standard must be agreed — this finish exposes it.

Mineral limewash

Best for
A soft, breathable finish with visible depth and movement.
Watch out
It is a texture, not just a colour — application skill decides the result, and touch-up is difficult.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher, and the cost is in application.
Consequential work
Requires a competent applicator and a sample panel signed off before the room is done.
Visible acoustic treatment — Fabric panels
Fabric panels
Visible acoustic treatment — PET felt
PET felt
Show the trade-offs

Fabric panels

Best for
The most absorption per area — rooms with a real echo problem.
Watch out
Fabric collects dust and, in a humid room, needs to be a material that tolerates it.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Panel positions should follow the reflection points, not just the composition.

PET felt

Best for
A durable, wipeable absorber that can also be a graphic element.
Watch out
Absorbs a narrower range than fabric over a cavity — good for speech, less for low frequencies.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Fixing and joint detail are visible; they need drawing.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon.

Shown in a commercial workplace — the same layout decision applies to a home office at smaller scale.

Office desking layout — Bench
Bench
Office desking layout — Cluster
Cluster
Office desking layout — Linear
Linear
Show the trade-offs

Bench

Best for
Dense teams that collaborate constantly — the most people per square metre.
Watch out
No acoustic or visual separation; concentration work suffers without a quiet area elsewhere.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The most efficient per person.
Consequential work
Power and data routing along the bench must be planned, plus a separate quiet space.

Cluster

Best for
Teams that work in small groups — a balance of contact and separation.
Watch out
Circulation between clusters eats floor area; the plan needs checking, not assuming.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Cable routing to each cluster is a separate run; confirm floor or ceiling delivery.

Linear

Best for
Narrow plans and along-the-wall arrangements.
Watch out
Everyone faces the same way — it can read institutional without relief.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Efficient in a narrow room.
Consequential work
Wall-mounted power is fixed early; changing the run later is rewiring.

Shown in a commercial meeting room — the lighting levels are the same decision at home-office scale.

Lighting levels — Executive Modern Office — Essential
Essential
Lighting levels — Executive Modern Office — Signature
Signature
Lighting levels — Executive Modern Office — Bespoke
Bespoke
Show the trade-offs

Essential

Best for
Meeting the working light level a desk needs, simply.
Watch out
Uniform light only; no relief between work and meeting zones.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The entry point.
Consequential work
Confirm the level suits the actual task, not just the area.

Signature

Best for
Separating work light from circulation and meeting areas.
Watch out
Zoning needs a control plan people can actually use.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above Essential.
Consequential work
Zoning and switching must map to how the office is used.

Bespoke

Best for
Where lighting supports brand and client-facing impression as well as work.
Watch out
The most coordination with ceiling, joinery and AV.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The top of the ladder.
Consequential work
Ceiling services, joinery and lighting coordinated as one set-out.

AI design concept. Final fixture count, lumen output, CRI, beam angle, drivers, circuits, dimming compatibility and electrical scope require selected-product data and approved technical documentation.

Interior door operation — Offset pivot
Offset pivot
Interior door operation — Surface sliding
Surface sliding
Show the trade-offs

Offset pivot

Best for
A wide or heavy leaf where a standard hinge would struggle.
Watch out
Floor and head fixings must be right; adjustment is less forgiving than a hinge.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Floor finish and threshold have to accommodate the pivot fixing.

Surface sliding

Best for
A sliding door without opening up the wall.
Watch out
The door and track are visible, and the wall beside it cannot be used.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Needs a clear parking wall the full door width, with nothing mounted on it.

2 options aren't shown yet — coming soon.

Glazing transparency — Clear
Clear
Glazing transparency — Opaque
Opaque
Glazing transparency — Reeded
Reeded
Show the trade-offs

Clear

Best for
Borrowing light and keeping sightlines — the most generous option spatially.
Watch out
No privacy at all, and it shows everything on both sides, including the mess.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive glass.
Consequential work
Decide manifestation or a visual cue at eye level so the pane reads as glass.

Opaque

Best for
Privacy while still passing light — bathrooms, bedrooms, anywhere a sightline is unwanted.
Watch out
Blocks the view entirely, so the borrowed-light benefit is the only one left.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Confirm which side the finish faces and how it cleans.

Reeded

Best for
Softening a sightline without losing the sense of light or depth — the middle answer.
Watch out
Distortion depends on distance; at close range it obscures far less than clients expect.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above clear glass.
Consequential work
Reed direction is a design decision and should be drawn, not left to the installer.
Retain / repair / replace — Repair
Repair
Retain / repair / replace — Upgrade
Upgrade
Show the trade-offs

Repair

Best for
Sound construction with surface damage — the fault is cosmetic, not structural.
Watch out
Repair reveals its own scope once opened; budget for a finding, not just the visible fault.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Lower than replacement, but less predictable.
Consequential work
Needs a hold point after opening up, so the decision can change on evidence.

Upgrade

Best for
Improving something that works — better performance without full replacement.
Watch out
The temptation is to upgrade what is visible rather than what fails; check the reasoning.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Between repair and replace.
Consequential work
Confirm the upgrade is compatible with what is retained around it.

2 options aren't shown yet — coming soon.

Window system — Aluminium casement (side-hung)
Aluminium casement (side-hung)
Window system — Sliding / large glazed
Sliding / large glazed
Show the trade-offs

Aluminium casement (side-hung)

Best for
Ventilation from a given opening — the sash opens fully, so airflow is typically good; it depends on sash size and wind direction.
Watch out
Cannot be left open in rain, and a full sash needs robust hinges in a coastal or humid location.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Needs swing clearance inside or out, and coordination with any security screen.

Sliding / large glazed

Best for
Wide openings where a swinging sash has nowhere to go.
Watch out
Only half the opening ever ventilates, and the bottom track collects dirt and needs regular clearing.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate; large spans cost more.
Consequential work
Track drainage must be resolved — a blocked track is a leak path in heavy rain.

2 options aren't shown yet — coming soon.

Wardrobe door type — Open
Open
Wardrobe door type — Sliding
Sliding
Wardrobe door type — Swing
Swing
Show the trade-offs

Open

Best for
Dressing rooms and dry, dust-free bedrooms where access speed matters.
Watch out
In a humid Sarawak bedroom an open wardrobe gives clothes no protection from dust or airborne moisture.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive.
Consequential work
Ventilation and dust become the room's problem; consider what sits opposite.

Sliding

Best for
Tight bedrooms where a swing door has nowhere to go.
Watch out
Only half the wardrobe is ever open, and the bottom track collects dust; you lose internal depth to the track.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Track type and internal depth loss must be settled before the internal layout.

Swing

Best for
Full access to the whole interior at once — the best view of what you own.
Watch out
Needs clear floor in front; in a small bedroom the swing competes with the bed.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive of the closed options.
Consequential work
Swing clearance must be drawn against the furniture layout, not assumed.
DS73B

Worktop Thickness Edge

Visual referenceKitchen

Reference sheet — Compares two things at once — worktop thickness (12, 20, 40 mm) and front-edge profile (square, mitred, eased). A reference sheet, not one choice: the survey asks thickness and edge as two questions.

Worktop Thickness Edge — design options shown side by side
Scroll the sheet sideways to read the labels.