BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.Until Share feedback
Design options KIT-01 — Kitchen

Kitchen layout

Look at the options, then save the one you prefer to ELS Design Brief.

Purpose: Design options

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

KIT-01

Kitchen layout

Kitchen
Kitchen layout — Galley
Galley
Plan: two facing runs with a 1,500 mm aisle as drawn, no corners
Best for
Narrow plans.
Watch out
Whether two people can pass while cooking depends on the clear aisle left with appliance doors and drawers open, and on how many cook at once — check the illustrated 1,500 mm aisle against your appliances and household. Door swings at either end can also fight the run.
Relative cost
Efficient: less run length than an L or U for the same storage.
Consequential work
Sets a minimum clear width between runs; confirm it before the plan is fixed.
Kitchen layout — L-shaped
L-shaped
Plan: a 1,800 mm run turns along the side wall, one corner
Best for
The general-purpose answer — works in most rooms and leaves a natural dining or circulation zone.
Watch out
The corner is dead volume unless a corner solution is specified with it.
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Pairs with a corner decision (KIT-09); leaving that open leaves storage unresolved.
Kitchen layout — Straight
Straight
Plan: one 4,200 mm run on one wall, no corners
Best for
Small apartments and utility runs where the kitchen is one wall.
Watch out
Everything competes for one run — sink, hob and fridge crowd each other and prep space suffers.
Relative cost
The least run length, so the least cabinetry.
Consequential work
Appliance positions must be settled early; there is no second wall to move something to.
Kitchen layout — U-shaped
U-shaped
Plan: runs on three walls, joined at two corners
Best for
Cooks who want maximum storage and worktop with everything in reach.
Watch out
Needs real floor width; two corners means two corner problems and a closed-in feel in a small room.
Relative cost
The most run length of the four.
Consequential work
Two corner solutions to decide, and the open end must still take a door or circulation.
Cost lines are relative and typical for the illustrated specification. Relative cost names the direct cost drivers, consequential work names what else changes, and watch out names the checks required. Exceptions and site conditions can change any of them. A relative direction, not an amount. Nothing here is a price; the figure belongs to whoever supplies the item and is set after measurement.

Supply and installation confirmed with your specification.

Ask ELS about this for my room

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown as design options for one decision.

More design options for this room

Kitchen — 26 more