BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.Until Share feedback
Design options KIT-08 — Kitchen

Handle approach

Look at the options, then save the one you prefer to ELS Design Brief.

Purpose: Design options

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

KIT-08

Handle approach

Kitchen
Handle approach — Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Best for
A fully handleless look with a continuous horizontal line, and a good fit where circulation is tight because nothing protrudes.
Watch out
The aluminium channel collects dust and grease and must be wiped along its length; a door out of alignment telegraphs down the whole rail.
Relative cost
Typically higher than a pull for the illustrated specification — the profile, its end caps and the fabrication all add; the premium depends on run length and finish.
Consequential work
Sets a continuous rail across the run, so cabinet heights, filler panels and the profile finish must all coordinate before fabrication.
Handle approach — Integrated edge pull
Integrated edge pull
Best for
A quieter line than a bar pull while keeping a real finger grip.
Watch out
The lip collects grease directly under the hand — the first place a wet kitchen shows wear.
Relative cost
Slightly above a bar pull.
Consequential work
Needs consistent door gaps across the run or the shadow line reads uneven.
Handle approach — Integrated J-pull
Integrated J-pull
Best for
A handleless front with nothing to catch on — fingers hook into a J-profile cut into the door's top edge, so the line stays flush without a channel in the carcass.
Watch out
The recess collects dust and grease and needs wiping. On base units the grip is at the top edge and on wall units at the bottom, so the two feel different in use.
Relative cost
Above a bar pull; below a gola channel, because nothing changes in the carcass.
Consequential work
The profile is cut into the door at fabrication, so the front material must take a machined edge, and the choice cannot be reversed once the fronts are made.
Handle approach — Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Best for
Everyday kitchens where a confident grip matters more than a flush line — and the easiest handle to replace later.
Watch out
Protrudes into circulation; in a galley it catches sleeves and pockets. Screw centres are fixed, so a later swap is limited to the same drilling.
Relative cost
The reference point — the least expensive of the four.
Consequential work
Fixes door drilling at carcass stage; changing your mind after fabrication means new fronts.
Cost lines are relative and typical for the illustrated specification. Relative cost names the direct cost drivers, consequential work names what else changes, and watch out names the checks required. Exceptions and site conditions can change any of them. A relative direction, not an amount. Nothing here is a price; the figure belongs to whoever supplies the item and is set after measurement.

Supply and installation confirmed with your specification.

Plan with ELS

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown as design options for one decision.

More design options for this room

Kitchen — 26 more