BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison KIT-08Kitchen DS01

Handle approach

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

KIT-08DS01

Handle approach

Kitchen
Handle approach — Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Best for
A fully handleless look with a continuous horizontal line, and the strongest choice where circulation is tight.
Watch out
The aluminium channel collects dust and grease and must be wiped along its length; a door out of alignment telegraphs down the whole rail.
Cost effect
Higher than any pull — the profile, its end caps and the fabrication all add.
Scope effect
Sets a continuous rail across the run, so cabinet heights, filler panels and the profile finish must all coordinate before fabrication.
Handle approach — Integrated edge pull
Integrated edge pull
Best for
A quieter line than a bar pull while keeping a real finger grip.
Watch out
The lip collects grease directly under the hand — the first place a wet kitchen shows wear.
Cost effect
Slightly above a bar pull.
Scope effect
Needs consistent door gaps across the run or the shadow line reads uneven.
Handle approach — Integrated J-pull
Integrated J-pull
Best for
A handleless front with nothing to catch on — fingers hook into a J-profile cut into the door's top edge, so the line stays flush without a channel in the carcass.
Watch out
The recess collects dust and grease and needs wiping. On base units the grip is at the top edge and on wall units at the bottom, so the two feel different in use.
Cost effect
Above a bar pull; below a gola channel, because nothing changes in the carcass.
Scope effect
The profile is cut into the door at fabrication, so the front material must take a machined edge, and the choice cannot be reversed once the fronts are made.
Handle approach — Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Best for
Everyday kitchens where a confident grip matters more than a flush line — and the easiest handle to replace later.
Watch out
Protrudes into circulation; in a galley it catches sleeves and pockets. Screw centres are fixed, so a later swap is limited to the same drilling.
Cost effect
The reference point — the least expensive of the six.
Scope effect
Fixes door drilling at carcass stage; changing your mind after fabrication means new fronts.

ELS field guidanceSettle before cabinets are cut (fabrication) · costly to change later · after KIT-07 Cabinet-front surface material

Record still pendingThe comparison is usable now; the supply and ownership record follows with your specification.

Who supplies this is confirmed with your specification — it is not yet stated here.

Plan with ELS

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Kitchen — 37 more

KIT-08 · Handle approach — Comparison | ELS