None of the ten decisions below has a complete, exact published match, but nine have real, narrower content worth pointing to — often filed under a different room's label, a different registry category, or ELS's StayReady rental-furnishing system rather than general homeowner guidance — and one, headboard treatment, has nothing beyond a named zone and a single unrelated furniture listing. Every gap is named specifically rather than smoothed over.
0 published9 partial1 not yet a decision
01 · Bed sizePartial
The registry has no bed-size decision of its own — no comparison of queen, king, super king or a custom platform as a room specification. The nearest real content is ELS's StayReady Furniture Designer's curated bed-frame types (single, queen, king), each a genuinely selectable catalogue entry — but that library is built for rental lets, its specs written around turnover durability rather than an owner-occupier's choice, and it stops at king: there's no super-king or custom-platform entry at any tier.
Ten authored bedroom layout patterns (two per house archetype) are real, live content at the Layout tool, and every one of them puts the bed on a named solid wall — centred on the room's most usable wall, or its quietest wall in a shoplot unit — with the wardrobe and desk deliberately kept off that wall. What the library doesn't offer is facing-window or facing-TV as an alternative: its own daylight rule reserves the window zone for a desk, dresser or seating, never the bed, so two of the four proposed positions are unmodelled by design rather than by omission.
Storage-first is a real, named layout pattern, and the bedroom's own site-survey questions ask directly whether a desk, dresser, cot or lounge chair is needed — the work-first/lounge-first distinction in substance. But there's no single, formal four-way sleep-first/storage-first/work-first/lounge-first comparison anywhere: the ten patterns are organised by house archetype first, and a bedroom built primarily around a lounge or seating zone has no authored pattern of its own — every one of the ten treats the bed as the fixed anchor and everything else as secondary to it.
One decision set is a real, live, owner-approved comparison of exactly three of the five proposed arrangements — an open wardrobe, sliding doors, and a swing (hinged) door — each written with a bedroom-specific tradeoff. Walk-in and dressing-room aren't modelled as their own arrangement: the closest real content is a walk-in dressing tier inside the separate wardrobe-internals decision (a bespoke interior fit-out, not a door-type comparison), so choosing between a hinged wardrobe and a genuine walk-in dressing room is actually two different registry questions, not one.
Four real, live comparison sheets carry almost this exact question — capacity allocation, hanging proportions, folded clothes/drawers/accessories, and shoes/handbags/luggage — alongside a general shelf-and-rail/fitted-internals/walk-in tier ladder in the registry. The one named mechanism this general content doesn't cover is the pull-down rail: that specific comparison exists only in ELS's separate StayReady hardware register, written for a landlord furnishing a rental unit rather than a homeowner, so the general-audience version hasn't been written separately yet.
There's no headboard-treatment decision anywhere in the registry — no comparison of a loose headboard, an upholstered panel, a timber feature wall and integrated side tables. Five of the ten bedroom layout patterns name a headboard feature wall as a product slot — a zone reserved for later, with no treatment specified — and the StayReady furniture library lists one single upholstered bed with headboard as one line among roughly a hundred furniture pieces, not compared against any alternative style.
07 · Window and privacyPartial
The general window-shading registry item already carries four of the five proposed values in substance — bare glass, roller/Venetian blinds, curtains (its own text: a sheer layer for glare plus a block-out layer for bedrooms), and motorised/smart shading — and one decision set renders the window-shading types directly. What's missing is a standalone blackout-only tier distinct from the sheer-plus-blackout curtain: the registry bundles both layers into one curtains option rather than offering blackout alone.
Central and layered lighting, cove lighting, and colour-temperature/white-light control are each a real, published registry decision, and one decision set renders the lighting scheme itself. Socket planning explicitly names bedside placement as one of the positions a planned layout accounts for. What none of this reaches is a dedicated reading-light or bedside-lamp fixture as its own decision — the only place either appears is as loose furniture (a reading floor lamp, a bedside table lamp) in ELS's StayReady furniture catalogue, a different system built for furnishing rental lets rather than a fixed-electrical decision.
One decision set is a real, live, three-way comparison of wall split, ceiling cassette and concealed ducted air-conditioning, and a ceiling fan is a separate, genuine registry option under the general ventilation item. What isn't modelled is a combined system as its own fourth choice — nothing in the registry compares running a split or ducted unit alongside a ceiling fan against either alone, so a client weighing a combined setup is reading two separate decisions, not one.
Floor material (SPC, porcelain tile, engineered timber), paint sheen (five real finishes from washable eggshell to mineral limewash), wall panelling (material, coverage and joint pattern as three separate live sheets) and visible acoustic treatment (fabric panels, PET felt, timber slats) are each a real, rendered, live comparison. All four are catalogued under Living as their formal room label rather than authored for a bedroom specifically — the products don't change by room, but nothing here was written with between-rooms acoustic privacy in mind — and carpet, the fourth flooring material this decision names, has no entry anywhere in the registry.