BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison LIV-10Living Room DS49

Visible acoustic treatment

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

LIV-10DS49

Visible acoustic treatment

Living Room
Visible acoustic treatment — Fabric panels
Fabric panels
Best for
The most absorption per area — rooms with a real echo problem.
Watch out
Fabric collects dust and, in a humid room, needs to be a material that tolerates it.
Cost effect
Moderate.
Scope effect
Panel positions should follow the reflection points, not just the composition.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS
Visible acoustic treatment — PET felt
PET felt
Best for
A durable, wipeable absorber that can also be a graphic element.
Watch out
Absorbs a narrower range than fabric over a cavity — good for speech, less for low frequencies.
Cost effect
Moderate.
Scope effect
Fixing and joint detail are visible; they need drawing.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS
Visible acoustic treatment — Timber slats
Timber slats
Best for
Where the room needs to look warm and calm as much as sound better.
Watch out
Absorption depends entirely on the backing behind the slats — slats alone do very little.
Cost effect
Higher.
Scope effect
The backing material is the acoustic decision; specify it, not just the slats.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS

ELS field guidanceNo fixed moment — a finish you can change later · easy to change later

Coordinated by ELS

Plan with ELS

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Living Room — 10 more

LIV-10 · Visible acoustic treatment — Comparison | ELS