BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison WHL-01Whole home DS19

Retain / repair / replace

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

WHL-01DS19

Retain / repair / replace

Whole home
Retain / repair / replace — Repair
Repair
Best for
Sound construction with surface damage — the fault is cosmetic, not structural.
Watch out
Repair reveals its own scope once opened; budget for a finding, not just the visible fault.
Cost effect
Lower than replacement, but less predictable.
Scope effect
Needs a hold point after opening up, so the decision can change on evidence.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS
Retain / repair / replace — Upgrade
Upgrade
Best for
Improving something that works — better performance without full replacement.
Watch out
The temptation is to upgrade what is visible rather than what fails; check the reasoning.
Cost effect
Between repair and replace.
Scope effect
Confirm the upgrade is compatible with what is retained around it.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS
Retain / repair / replace — Replace
Replace
Best for
Where the element has failed or will fail within the life of the renovation.
Watch out
Replacement pulls in the adjoining trades — you rarely replace one thing on its own.
Cost effect
The highest of the four.
Scope effect
Sequencing matters: identify which trades follow, and in what order.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon.

ELS field guidanceSettle before any quotation · hard to reverse once built

Coordinated by ELS

Plan with ELS

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

WHL-01 · Retain / repair / replace — Comparison | ELS