BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison OFF-01Office DS34

Office desking layout

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

OFF-01DS34

Office desking layout

Office

Shown in a commercial workplace — the same layout decision applies to a home office at smaller scale.

Office desking layout — Bench
Bench
Best for
Dense teams that collaborate constantly — the most people per square metre.
Watch out
No acoustic or visual separation; concentration work suffers without a quiet area elsewhere.
Cost effect
The most efficient per person.
Scope effect
Power and data routing along the bench must be planned, plus a separate quiet space.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Office desking layout — Cluster
Cluster
Best for
Teams that work in small groups — a balance of contact and separation.
Watch out
Circulation between clusters eats floor area; the plan needs checking, not assuming.
Cost effect
Moderate.
Scope effect
Cable routing to each cluster is a separate run; confirm floor or ceiling delivery.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Office desking layout — Linear
Linear
Best for
Narrow plans and along-the-wall arrangements.
Watch out
Everyone faces the same way — it can read institutional without relief.
Cost effect
Efficient in a narrow room.
Scope effect
Wall-mounted power is fixed early; changing the run later is rewiring.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

ELS field guidanceSettle before any quotation · costly to change later

Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

Request validation

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Office — 2 more

OFF-01 · Office desking layout — Comparison | ELS