BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison COM-01Commercial space DS36

Commercial space conversion

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

COM-01DS36

Commercial space conversion

Commercial space
Commercial space conversion — Operational
Operational
Best for
Businesses whose margin depends on how the back works, not how the front looks.
Watch out
The customer-facing impression stays as-is, which may undercut the operational gain.
Cost effect
Concentrated out of sight.
Scope effect
Sequence against trading hours; operational work is harder to phase around a live business.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS
Commercial space conversion — Shell services
Shell services
Best for
Getting the base right — services, envelope, compliance — before any fit-out.
Watch out
It looks like nothing was done, which is hard for a client to see value in.
Cost effect
Foundational rather than visible.
Scope effect
Everything downstream depends on this being complete; it sets the programme.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS
Commercial space conversion — Turnkey
Turnkey
Best for
A single coordinated scope from shell to opening.
Watch out
The largest single commitment, and it needs the fullest documentation before work starts.
Cost effect
The highest.
Scope effect
Requires the complete drawing and trade-scope set up front; this is the most coordination-heavy option.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon.

ELS field guidanceSettle before any quotation · hard to reverse once built

Coordinated by ELS

Plan with ELS

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Commercial space — 1 more

COM-01 · Commercial space conversion — Comparison | ELS