BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.Until Share feedback
Room Decision System

Every set of design options, side by side.

The whole browsable set, filterable by room.

Design options

61 sets of design options — 36 with named options · 25 visual referencesThese are concept design options — looking at one chooses nothing and prices nothing. Quoting one needs your choice, the room it is for, and an ELS check against the specification.Cost lines are relative and typical for the illustrated specification. Relative cost names the direct cost drivers, consequential work names what else changes, and watch out names the checks required. Exceptions and site conditions can change any of them. A relative direction, not an amount. Nothing here is a price; the figure belongs to whoever supplies the item and is set after measurement.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown as design options for one decision.

Supply and installation confirmed with your specification. How this is priced is confirmed after measurement, by whoever supplies it.

Kitchen layout — Galley
Galley
Plan: two facing runs with a 1,500 mm aisle as drawn, no corners
Kitchen layout — L-shaped
L-shaped
Plan: a 1,800 mm run turns along the side wall, one corner
Kitchen layout — Straight
Straight
Plan: one 4,200 mm run on one wall, no corners
Kitchen layout — U-shaped
U-shaped
Plan: runs on three walls, joined at two corners
Show the trade-offs

Galley

Best for
Narrow plans.
Watch out
Whether two people can pass while cooking depends on the clear aisle left with appliance doors and drawers open, and on how many cook at once — check the illustrated 1,500 mm aisle against your appliances and household. Door swings at either end can also fight the run.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Efficient: less run length than an L or U for the same storage.
Consequential work
Sets a minimum clear width between runs; confirm it before the plan is fixed.

L-shaped

Best for
The general-purpose answer — works in most rooms and leaves a natural dining or circulation zone.
Watch out
The corner is dead volume unless a corner solution is specified with it.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Pairs with a corner decision (KIT-09); leaving that open leaves storage unresolved.

Straight

Best for
Small apartments and utility runs where the kitchen is one wall.
Watch out
Everything competes for one run — sink, hob and fridge crowd each other and prep space suffers.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least run length, so the least cabinetry.
Consequential work
Appliance positions must be settled early; there is no second wall to move something to.

U-shaped

Best for
Cooks who want maximum storage and worktop with everything in reach.
Watch out
Needs real floor width; two corners means two corner problems and a closed-in feel in a small room.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The most run length of the four.
Consequential work
Two corner solutions to decide, and the open end must still take a door or circulation.
Kitchen tier ladder — Essential
Essential
Kitchen tier ladder — Signature
Signature
Kitchen tier ladder — Bespoke
Bespoke
Show the trade-offs

Essential

Best for
A sound, honest kitchen where the budget is better spent on getting the wet zone right than on finish.
Watch out
The specification is decided for you; expect fewer choices in fronts, hardware and internal fittings.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The entry point of the ladder.
Consequential work
Moisture zone still governs — the tier never overrides what a wet area requires.

Signature

Best for
The middle of the ladder, where finish and hardware quality start to show daily.
Watch out
Easy to spend here on what shows and under-specify what does not — the carcass matters more than the front.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above Essential.
Consequential work
Confirm which upgrades are finish and which are construction; they are not the same decision.

Bespoke

Best for
Where the joinery is genuinely bespoke — non-standard dimensions, unusual materials, a specific detail.
Watch out
Bespoke means longer lead time and less margin for a late change; the drawing has to be right.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The top of the ladder.
Consequential work
Requires the fullest drawing set and the earliest freeze on dimensions and appliances.
Island vs peninsula — Island
Island
Island vs peninsula — No island
No island
Show the trade-offs

Island

Best for
Rooms with genuine circulation space on all four sides.
Watch out
Clearance is the whole question; an island in a room that cannot take it makes the kitchen worse, not better.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The most, especially if services run to it.
Consequential work
Any sink or hob in the island means plumbing or ducting through the floor — a construction decision, not a layout one.

No island

Best for
Small kitchens where the floor is worth more than the extra worktop.
Watch out
Loses the social centre an island gives; the run does all the work.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
None.
Consequential work
Prep space must be found in the run instead — check it is adequate.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon: Peninsula.

Tall-unit and fridge placement — End group
End group
Tall-unit and fridge placement — Split
Split
Show the trade-offs

End group

Best for
Keeping the worktop continuous — one unbroken prep surface, with the fridge and the tall storage standing together at the end nearest the entry or the dining side.
Watch out
The group is deep and tall; at the wrong end it blocks a window or crowds the door. The fridge door needs clear space to open fully against the run's end.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Neutral to slightly less — fewer junctions between tall and base cabinetry, so fewer fillers and end panels.
Consequential work
Fixes which end takes the power point and any water point for the fridge; decide with the layout (KIT-01), because the group's end sets the prep-zone length.

Split

Best for
Placing the fridge near the entry or dining side and the oven tower near the cooking zone, when one tall group would put one of them in the wrong place.
Watch out
Each tall unit breaks the worktop; two breaks means two shorter prep surfaces, and more end panels and junctions to detail.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Slightly more — additional end panels, fillers and junction details.
Consequential work
Two power positions and two junctions to draw; both must be fixed before the carcass order, because a tall unit cannot move once the base run is cut around it.
Tall-group wall integration — Recessed niche
Recessed niche
Tall-group wall integration — Surface-mounted
Surface-mounted
Show the trade-offs

Recessed niche

Best for
A flush, built-in read where the tall group sits back into the wall plane — the calmest result in a small kitchen where the group's full depth would otherwise intrude.
Watch out
The niche has to exist or be built, which depends on the wall being non-structural or on a pocket being framed. Its dimensions have to be exact; a niche a few centimetres out cannot be fixed with a filler.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — builder's work (framing and plastering) before any cabinetry, and the tall group is measured to the niche once it is built.
Consequential work
A first-fix decision: the niche is formed before walls close, and the cabinetry is fabricated to the finished niche. Measuring the cabinetry to a drawing instead of the built niche is where this goes wrong.

Surface-mounted

Best for
Any wall, no builder's work — the usual approach, and the one that keeps the cabinetry independent of the building.
Watch out
The group's full depth projects into the room; its side is a visible end panel that needs a finish, and the junction with the ceiling needs its own decision (KIT-16).
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point — no wall work.
Consequential work
Nothing beyond the cabinetry; the end-panel finish and the top junction are decided with the fronts.
Handle approach — Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Handleless / recessed (Gola)
Handle approach — Integrated edge pull
Integrated edge pull
Handle approach — Integrated J-pull
Integrated J-pull
Handle approach — Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Bar pull (surface-mounted)
Show the trade-offs

Handleless / recessed (Gola)

Best for
A fully handleless look with a continuous horizontal line, and a good fit where circulation is tight because nothing protrudes.
Watch out
The aluminium channel collects dust and grease and must be wiped along its length; a door out of alignment telegraphs down the whole rail.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Typically higher than a pull for the illustrated specification — the profile, its end caps and the fabrication all add; the premium depends on run length and finish.
Consequential work
Sets a continuous rail across the run, so cabinet heights, filler panels and the profile finish must all coordinate before fabrication.

Integrated edge pull

Best for
A quieter line than a bar pull while keeping a real finger grip.
Watch out
The lip collects grease directly under the hand — the first place a wet kitchen shows wear.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Slightly above a bar pull.
Consequential work
Needs consistent door gaps across the run or the shadow line reads uneven.

Integrated J-pull

Best for
A handleless front with nothing to catch on — fingers hook into a J-profile cut into the door's top edge, so the line stays flush without a channel in the carcass.
Watch out
The recess collects dust and grease and needs wiping. On base units the grip is at the top edge and on wall units at the bottom, so the two feel different in use.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Above a bar pull; below a gola channel, because nothing changes in the carcass.
Consequential work
The profile is cut into the door at fabrication, so the front material must take a machined edge, and the choice cannot be reversed once the fronts are made.

Bar pull (surface-mounted)

Best for
Everyday kitchens where a confident grip matters more than a flush line — and the easiest handle to replace later.
Watch out
Protrudes into circulation; in a galley it catches sleeves and pockets. Screw centres are fixed, so a later swap is limited to the same drilling.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point — the least expensive of the four.
Consequential work
Fixes door drilling at carcass stage; changing your mind after fabrication means new fronts.
Corner solution — Blind corner shelf
Blind corner shelf
Fixed L-shelves, reach in
Corner solution — Corner carousel (lazy Susan)
Corner carousel (lazy Susan)
Trays revolve on a centre pole
Corner solution — Magic-corner swing-out
Magic-corner swing-out
Front baskets swing out, rear baskets slide forward
Show the trade-offs

Blind corner shelf

Best for
Accepting a lost corner to keep the budget in the doors and fronts where it shows.
Watch out
The space is genuinely unreachable — it becomes storage nobody uses, which is a real loss in a small kitchen.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive: there is no mechanism.
Consequential work
None beyond honest expectation-setting; decide this deliberately rather than by omission.

Corner carousel (lazy Susan)

Best for
Getting usable access to a blind corner without bespoke joinery.
Watch out
The rotating tray wastes the corner volume it turns in, and heavy items unbalance it.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Moderate — a standard fitting.
Consequential work
Sets a minimum corner cabinet width; check the door swing does not foul the adjacent run.

Magic-corner swing-out

Best for
Small kitchens where the corner has to earn its volume.
Watch out
The most mechanism in the kitchen, so the most to go wrong; alignment is fussy and service means a specialist.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest of the three.
Consequential work
Needs a specified opening width and a door front that can carry the pull-out weight.
Sink-run material — Aluminium-frame ACP infill
Aluminium-frame ACP infill
Sink-run material — Aluminium-honeycomb panel
Aluminium-honeycomb panel
Sink-run material — HPL-faced EN 636-3 plywood
HPL-faced EN 636-3 plywood
Show the trade-offs

Aluminium-frame ACP infill

Best for
The wet run and the sink base — the case aluminium composite exists for.
Watch out
It is a construction choice, not a finish: it does not change how the kitchen looks, so it is easy to cut and regret.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Below honeycomb.
Consequential work
This is the moisture-zone decision the whole kitchen hangs on; settle it before fronts and finishes.

Aluminium-honeycomb panel

Best for
The wettest positions, and where weight matters as well as water.
Watch out
Cut edges and fixings need the right detail; it is not forgiving of on-site improvisation.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The highest of the three.
Consequential work
Fixing method and edge treatment must be specified, not left to the installer.

HPL-faced EN 636-3 plywood

Best for
A middle path where a timber substrate is wanted and exposure is real but not constant.
Watch out
Grade and glue line vary widely between suppliers — the name on the sheet is not a specification.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Below ACP.
Consequential work
Requires the actual grade to be named in the specification, not just 'waterproof plywood'.

Plywood only where the room's specification names this grade. Otherwise the wet sink run is aluminium (ACP or honeycomb), or protected P6 where ALUMAX's listed protections are recorded and ALUMAX's site measurement finds P6 suitable; aluminium where it does not.

Not pictured here: protected P6. Unprotected board swells at the edges under a kitchen sink and fails from the inside, so ELS allows P6 there only with ALUMAX's listed protections — foil, sealed edges and penetrations, a raised bottom edge and a leak inspection — and where ALUMAX's site measurement finds P6 suitable; where it rules P6 unsuitable, the sink run is aluminium.

Wall-cabinet height — Extended 900 mm
Extended 900 mm
Wall-cabinet height — Stacked top box (720 + 300 mm)
Stacked top box (720 + 300 mm)
Wall-cabinet height — Standard 720 mm
Standard 720 mm
Show the trade-offs

Stacked top box (720 + 300 mm)

Best for
Using the ceiling height for long-term storage — the top box takes what is used rarely, and the run reads floor to ceiling.
Watch out
Whether the top box is within comfortable reach depends on the underside height above the finished floor, the gap above the worktop and the person using it, so plan it for rarely used items and check it against the user. Two boxes stacked show a horizontal joint line unless the fronts are made as one tall door.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — a second carcass and a second front per cabinet.
Consequential work
Ceiling height measured at several points along the run, because a ceiling out of level shows at the top box; and a decision on whether fronts are one door or two.

Standard 720 mm

Best for
The reference carcass height, with whatever sits above it decided separately. How comfortably the top shelf is reached depends on the underside height above the finished floor, the gap above the worktop and the person using it, not on carcass height alone.
Watch out
The space above is either wasted or has to be closed; left open it collects dust and, in a wok kitchen, grease.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point — one carcass per cabinet.
Consequential work
Decide what happens above at the same time: an open gap, a plasterboard soffit or a scribed infill (KIT-16).
Wall-cabinet opening — Hinged doors
Hinged doors
Wall-cabinet opening — Lift-up (stay-open)
Lift-up (stay-open)
Show the trade-offs

Hinged doors

Best for
The default — a simple build, typically lower cost and easy to service.
Watch out
The open door sits at head height over a work zone.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive.
Consequential work
Swing direction should be drawn against the work sequence, not chosen on site.

Lift-up (stay-open)

Best for
A clean opening above a work zone with nothing at head height.
Watch out
Gas stays are a wear part and a heavy front will drift as they age.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher.
Consequential work
Requires clear headroom and a decision on strut serviceability.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon: Bi-fold lift.

Wall-cabinet opening — design options sheet
Reference sheet — not a selectable option Scroll the sheet sideways to read the labels.
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Adjustable shelves
Adjustable shelves
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Full-extension trays
Full-extension trays
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Inner drawers
Inner drawers
Kitchen internal storage configuration — Vertical dividers
Vertical dividers
Show the trade-offs

Adjustable shelves

Best for
Tall and base cabinets holding tall or irregular items, where flexibility over the years matters more than reach.
Watch out
In a deep base cabinet, shelves swallow what is at the back. Shelf pins are the weak point, and a loaded shelf sags over a wide span.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The least expensive — the reference point.
Consequential work
None significant; shelves can be moved or added later without touching the carcass.

Full-extension trays

Best for
Deep base cabinets — the back becomes as reachable as the front, so pots and stacks stop hiding.
Watch out
The runners take width and depth from the carcass, and they are the wear part; a tray behind a door needs the door open first, so a drawer front is usually the better pairing.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — a pair of runners and a tray per pull-out.
Consequential work
Runner load rating and tray depth are fixed at carcass stage, because the carcass is drilled for them.

Inner drawers

Best for
A second tier behind one front — cutlery, spices and utensils in fixed lanes without adding a door or drawer face to the elevation.
Watch out
Two actions to reach the inner drawer, and the internal height is split, so tall items no longer fit in that cabinet.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Higher — a drawer box and its runners for each inner drawer.
Consequential work
Internal heights are planned against what goes where, and fixed before fabrication.

Vertical dividers

Best for
Trays, chopping boards and baking sheets stored on edge — visible and reachable in a narrow cabinet.
Watch out
Only for flat items; a divided cabinet is single-purpose and cannot easily be given another job later.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Low — dividers are simple joinery.
Consequential work
Decide which cabinet takes them before fabrication; the slot spacing is fixed.
Cabinet colour blocking — Single tone
Single tone
Cabinet colour blocking — Two-tone horizontal
Two-tone horizontal
Show the trade-offs

Single tone

Best for
A calm, continuous kitchen that lets the worktop or backsplash lead.
Watch out
A long single-tone run can read flat without a change of material somewhere.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
The reference point.
Consequential work
None significant — the simplest to specify and to replace a part of.

Two-tone horizontal

Best for
Grounding the run with a darker base and lifting the uppers.
Watch out
A horizontal split can lower the apparent ceiling in an already low room.
Cost and scope2
Relative cost
Slightly above single-tone.
Consequential work
Check against ceiling height before committing.

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon.

Cabinet colour blocking — design options sheet
Reference sheet — not a selectable option Scroll the sheet sideways to read the labels.