Room Decision System

Every set of design options, side by side.

The whole browsable set, filterable by room.

Design options

61 sets of design options — 36 with named options · 25 visual referencesThese are concept design options — looking at one chooses nothing and prices nothing. Quoting one needs your choice, the room it is for, and an ELS check against the specification.Cost lines are relative and typical for the illustrated specification. Relative cost names the direct cost drivers, consequential work names what else changes, and watch out names the checks required. Exceptions and site conditions can change any of them. A relative direction, not an amount. Nothing here is a price; the figure belongs to whoever supplies the item and is set after measurement.

Deciding about

Kitchen 27 Living Room 10 Whole home 5 Bathroom 4 Wardrobe 4 Office 3 Any cabinet 2 Between rooms 2 Commercial space 2 Feature Wall 2 Display cabinet 1 Entrance 1 Staircase 1 Study/Home Office 1 Wet kitchen 1 Windows 1 Explore all design options 61

On this device

4 of 4 · Wardrobe

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown as design options for one decision.

Supply and installation confirmed with your specification. How this is priced is confirmed after measurement, by whoever supplies it.

WRD-01

Wardrobe door type

Wardrobe

Show the trade-offs

Open

Best for: Dressing rooms and dry, dust-free bedrooms where access speed matters.
Watch out: In a humid Sarawak bedroom an open wardrobe gives clothes no protection from dust or airborne moisture.

Cost and scope2

Relative cost: The least expensive.
Consequential work: Ventilation and dust become the room's problem; consider what sits opposite.

Sliding

Best for: Tight bedrooms where a swing door has nowhere to go.
Watch out: Only half the wardrobe is ever open, and the bottom track collects dust; you lose internal depth to the track.

Cost and scope2

Relative cost: Moderate.
Consequential work: Track type and internal depth loss must be settled before the internal layout.

Swing

Best for: Full access to the whole interior at once — the best view of what you own.
Watch out: Needs clear floor in front; in a small bedroom the swing competes with the bed.

Cost and scope2

Relative cost: The least expensive of the closed options.
Consequential work: Swing clearance must be drawn against the furniture layout, not assumed.

Ask ELS about this for my room

DS87