BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.Until Share feedback
Design options OPO-03 — Between rooms

Glazing transparency

Look at the options, then save the one you prefer to ELS Design Brief.

Purpose: Design options

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

OPO-03

Glazing transparency

Between rooms
Glazing transparency — Clear
Clear
Best for
Borrowing light and keeping sightlines — the most generous option spatially.
Watch out
No privacy at all, and it shows everything on both sides, including the mess.
Relative cost
The least expensive glass.
Consequential work
Decide manifestation or a visual cue at eye level so the pane reads as glass.
Glazing transparency — Opaque
Opaque
Best for
Privacy while still passing light — bathrooms, bedrooms, anywhere a sightline is unwanted.
Watch out
Blocks the view entirely, so the borrowed-light benefit is the only one left.
Relative cost
Moderate.
Consequential work
Confirm which side the finish faces and how it cleans.
Glazing transparency — Reeded
Reeded
Best for
Softening a sightline without losing the sense of light or depth — the middle answer.
Watch out
Distortion depends on distance; at close range it obscures far less than clients expect.
Relative cost
Above clear glass.
Consequential work
Reed direction is a design decision and should be drawn, not left to the installer.
Cost lines are relative and typical for the illustrated specification. Relative cost names the direct cost drivers, consequential work names what else changes, and watch out names the checks required. Exceptions and site conditions can change any of them. A relative direction, not an amount. Nothing here is a price; the figure belongs to whoever supplies the item and is set after measurement.

Supply and installation confirmed with your specification.

Plan with ELS

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown as design options for one decision.

More design options for this room

Between rooms — 1 more