BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison OPO-03Between rooms DS20

Glazing transparency

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

OPO-03DS20

Glazing transparency

Between rooms
Glazing transparency — Clear
Clear
Best for
Borrowing light and keeping sightlines — the most generous option spatially.
Watch out
No privacy at all, and it shows everything on both sides, including the mess.
Cost effect
The least expensive glass.
Scope effect
Decide manifestation or a visual cue at eye level so the pane reads as glass.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Glazing transparency — Opaque
Opaque
Best for
Privacy while still passing light — bathrooms, bedrooms, anywhere a sightline is unwanted.
Watch out
Blocks the view entirely, so the borrowed-light benefit is the only one left.
Cost effect
Moderate.
Scope effect
Confirm which side the finish faces and how it cleans.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Glazing transparency — Reeded
Reeded
Best for
Softening a sightline without losing the sense of light or depth — the middle answer.
Watch out
Distortion depends on distance; at close range it obscures far less than clients expect.
Cost effect
Above clear glass.
Scope effect
Reed direction is a design decision and should be drawn, not left to the installer.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

ELS field guidanceSettle before cabinets are cut (fabrication) · costly to change later · after OPO-01 Partition operation

Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

Request validation

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Between rooms — 3 more

OPO-03 · Glazing transparency — Comparison | ELS