BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison KIT-04Kitchen DS115

Wet and dry kitchen separation

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

KIT-04DS115

Wet and dry kitchen separation

Kitchen
Wet and dry kitchen separation — Dry only
Dry only
Best for
Households that genuinely cook light — no heavy frying, no wok work.
Watch out
A Sarawak household that later cooks heavily will move grease and steam into the living space.
Cost effect
The least expensive — one kitchen.
Scope effect
Be honest about how the household actually cooks; this decision is hard to reverse.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS
Wet and dry kitchen separation — Wet-dry connected
Wet-dry connected
Best for
Keeping the two zones in contact while separating the heavy work.
Watch out
An open connection still lets grease and steam travel; extraction has to do the work.
Cost effect
Moderate.
Scope effect
Extraction and airflow become the critical decision, not the partition.
Responsible
Coordinated by ELS

One option isn't shown yet — coming soon.

ELS field guidanceSettle before any quotation · hard to reverse once built

Coordinated by ELS

Plan with ELS

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Kitchen — 37 more

KIT-04 · Wet and dry kitchen separation — Comparison | ELS