BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison OPO-04Between rooms DS51

Opening-hardware close-up

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

OPO-04DS51

Opening-hardware close-up

Between rooms

Shown on an interior door — the same hardware is specified across openings.

Opening-hardware close-up — Lever mortise
Lever mortise
Best for
The everyday interior door — familiar, serviceable, inexpensive.
Watch out
Finish wears at the hand; a cheap plating goes first.
Cost effect
The least expensive.
Scope effect
Handing and backset need confirming before the door is machined.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Opening-hardware close-up — Pull deadbolt
Pull deadbolt
Best for
Entry doors where security and a deliberate gesture both matter.
Watch out
Two separate items to align and finish-match.
Cost effect
Moderate.
Scope effect
Both must be set out on the same drawing or they will not align.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Opening-hardware close-up — Smart lock
Smart lock
Best for
Shared or rented access where keys are the actual problem.
Watch out
It has a battery and firmware — it is a maintained device, not a fitting. Plan for a mechanical override.
Cost effect
The highest.
Scope effect
Confirm the door thickness and prep the lock requires, plus a power and override plan.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

ELS field guidanceSettle before installation day · easy to change later · after OPO-02 Interior door operation

Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

Request validation

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Between rooms — 3 more

OPO-04 · Opening-hardware close-up — Comparison | ELS