BETAWe're refining the site during beta testing.UntilShare feedback
Comparison OPO-01Between rooms DS21

Partition operation

Same room, same camera, one variable changed — so the difference is shown, not described. Compare the options, then save the one you prefer to My Project.

Design intent — subject to feasibility and site measurement; any variation is agreed with you before work continues.

OPO-01DS21

Partition operation

Between rooms
Partition operation — Adjustable
Adjustable
Best for
Rooms whose use changes through the day — the most flexible of the three.
Watch out
Flexibility costs mechanism, and a mechanism used daily is a maintenance item.
Cost effect
The highest.
Scope effect
Needs a decided parked position and clearance for it, or the flexibility is theoretical.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Partition operation — Fixed
Fixed
Best for
A permanent separation where the layout is settled.
Watch out
It is a wall: changing your mind later is construction, not adjustment.
Cost effect
The least expensive.
Scope effect
Confirm ventilation and light are still resolved on both sides.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX
Partition operation — Sliding
Sliding
Best for
Closing a space occasionally without giving up the opening permanently.
Watch out
The panel has to go somewhere — a pocket needs wall depth, a surface track shows.
Cost effect
Moderate.
Scope effect
Decide pocket versus surface track early; a pocket is a structural decision.
Responsible
Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

ELS field guidanceSettle before walls close (first fix) · hard to reverse once built

Supplied and installed by ALUMAX

Request validation

Concept renders — a design render, not a photo. Shown to compare options for one decision.

More comparisons for this room

Between rooms — 3 more

OPO-01 · Partition operation — Comparison | ELS